At least 85 percent of both policymakers and "opinion elites" surveyed in and around Washington, D.C., agree that "if we do not get the national debt under control, it will overwhelm the federal budget and damage the economy in the long run." But only 13 percent of policymakers and 9 percent of elites cite the national debt as their top priority, according to The Buck Stops Where?, a Public Agenda survey done for the John D. and Catherine T.
Research Studies: Economy, Workforce & Welfare
The Buck Stops Where?: What D.C. Influencers Say About The National Debt

Are We Beginning To See The Light?: Public And Parents Buy Into The Need To Ramp Up Math And Science Education But Most Still Think Their Local Schools Are Doing Fine

Americans are convinced that math and science skills are crucial for the future, according to "Are We Beginning To See The Light?", a Public Agenda survey which found strong majorities who say there will be more jobs and college opportunities for students with those skills.
A Place to Call Home: What Immigrants Say Now About Life in America

The Energy Learning Curve: Coming from different starting points, the public sees similar solutions

The first Energy Learning Curve ™ report, released in association with Planet Forward, finds the American people reaching common ground on at least 10 major energy proposals, particularly on alternative energy. But the public may not yet be prepared for the tradeoffs and challenges needed to make these proposals a reality.
Compassion, Concern and Conflicted Feelings: New Yorkers on Homelessness and Housing

A Few Bad Apples?: An Exploratory Look at What Typical Americans Think about Business Ethics Today
Now That I'm Here: What America's Immigrants Have to Say About Life in the U.S. Today

A survey of immigrants finds an overwhelming majority committed to working hard and staying off government assistance. Almost nine in 10 say it's extremely important for immigrants to learn English and their views on bilingual education are similar to the general public. A majority has a favorable view of the INS, although they express frustration with immigration bureaucracy. Three-quarters say the government has become stricter with immigrants since Sept. 11 and six in 10 say there is at least some anti-immigrant discrimination in the U.S.
Talking about discrimination, it has always taken me aback how the federal agencies and other authorities did the mass roundup and detention of Arabs and Muslims since September 11. These ethnic groups were highly targeted during that period of chaos bringing a huge wave of racism regardless of their gesture whatsoever. Not surprisingly, hate crimes and other forms of harassment against Arabs and Muslims have risen in tandem with government-sanctioned profiling.










Id do a bit of everything (never happen in DC though unfortunately). Drill on the coasts and in Alaska (a stopgap at best but realistically it would be temporary and eventually the land would return to normal after the oil is harvested), Mine Uranium and Coal (stopgap as well), use natural gas from us (another stopgap), build wind power / solar (Id make it all tax deductable big time), and build nuclear power plants (a stopgap as well but longer term than oil since Canada US and Australia have most of the uranium), and look into oil shale (us has huge reserve) as a last ditch item. Id make Nuclear Power tax free as well (or subsidized by government). Anything to improve overall balance of trade and keep our cashflow here in the U.S. I would Invest in electric cars (like the Tesla company) but Id lean towards make buying them tax free with a hefty tax credit to boot. I feel the answer with alternative is tax credits and tax freedom/incentives, not government splurging and taxing. If you go with the method i propose the market will decide which alternative energy company succeeds. I feel cap and trade is just a way for the congress to find another source of revenue without calling it a tax. A more pie in the sky approach would be to continue to Fund fusion research (National Ignition facility etc and the European one). The problem there is materials science to find materials that can contain the heat of the fusion reaction in the reaction chamber. Id work on that first before building the fusion reactor. On the crazy side, Id move toward for zero population growth (yeah that will be popular LOL) since fundamentally people are the environmental problem when you get down to it. If you really buy into global warming thats the ultimate solution. Nobody will touch that with a 10 foot pole though as it would be political suicide. But I feel methods like cap and trade are just smoke and mirrors for the true environmental issue - we have too many people on the earth.