Public Agenda Issue Guide: Right to Die

Citizens

are confronted with serious issues every minute of the day. Grasping the underlying issues from the headlines is a difficult task. Give us ten minutes a day and we will help bring clarity to the chaos of the news, policy and issues.

ON THE AGENDA

Grading Teachers, Measuring Success

Scott Bittle
Sep 2, 2010

When databases and disenchantment collide, the results can be explosive – as the debate over "value-added" grading of teachers showed this week.

Comment Read More

Does First Out of the Application Gate Mean Most Likely to Graduate?

Scott Bittle
Aug 12, 2010

There are people who wait until the last minute, and then there are people like high school student Cree Bautista, who holds the honor of being the being the first student in the United States to apply to college this year, a mere three hours and thirty minutes after the "common application" form went online.

Comment Read More

FACING UP TO THE
Nation's Finances

National Debt Clock

ISSUE GUIDE: Right to Die

OVERVIEW

Right to Die

The process of dying has become far more complicated than it once was.

A century ago, most people died at home of illnesses that medicine could do little to defeat. Today, a hospital, nursing home or hospice is a far more likely setting, but the place of death is not the only thing that has changed. Technology has created choices for patients and their families - choices that raise basic questions about human dignity and what constitutes a "good death."

GET THE FACTS

View All Charts

CONSIDER THE CHOICES

Recognize the right to die with dignity, with a physician's assistance

Focus on giving comfort and recognizing the patient's preferences

Reaffirm the commitment to preserve life

While life must be protected, we must also permit people to have a humane death. Individuals have a right to determine the time and circumstances of their death. When people are near death and in unbearable pain or anguish, they should be free to seek medical assistance in ending their lives. It has long been recognized that patients have a right to refuse life-support technology, or to have it withdrawn when efforts to extend life are futile. By the same token, individuals should be permitted to seek a physician's assistance in dying when they choose to do so.
Read More

The debate over physician-assisted suicide has arisen largely because health care professionals routinely overlook patients' preferences, or fail to provide palliative care. Hospital patients often die in great pain, despite the fact that medications are available to ease their suffering. As physicians focus on taking every possible medical measure to keep patients alive, they often fail to relieve the pain and depression patients experience. Recognizing the patient's right to control the treatment they receive is a far better solution than encouraging physicians to supervise suicides.
Read More

By condemning the practice of physician-assisted suicide, and reiterating why it must remain illegal, we affirm the unconditional value of human life. Society as a whole must reaffirm the commitment to preserve life whenever possible. Except when patients explicitly decline further treatment, physicians must make every effort to sustain life. Any compromise in the commitment of medical professionals to protect and extend life would undermine the public's faith in the medical profession.
Read More